CC, that's a good idea, but does have a downside. All this cumulative information on Crouse Hinds means that there's a lot of information on Crouse Hinds.

IOW, not exactly a bite-sized project. I don't want to start with the biggest project, but rather work our way up to it.
This is not to say that should anyone feel like contributing to ANY data page, that they should refrain from doing so - quite the contrary. I would
love to see a flood of signal data and history on Crouse Hinds and/or on any other manufacturer that anyone might have some info on. If the topic doesn't already exist here under 'Wiki Topics', then feel free to start a new one, but please follow the subject heading format of "<manufacturer> page".
I'm afraid I disagree on the consolidation point. I think it's important to keep the companies as separate as possible in order to avoid confusion and to avoid homogenization of any one multi-Mfr. product line. Obviously we'll point out, whenever possible, the similarities and outright 'use of the same molds' when they occur. And I do like the idea of the 'family tree' as a visualization tool.