Macsignals wrote:RunsWithCrouse-Hinds wrote:Pardon me for interjecting, but what about the "shine" of a new poly signal guarantees its quality? If you wanted I could ask my uncle the plastics engineer about this, but I'm pretty sure the shininess is just cosmetic, and wears off over time anyway. Traffic signals are overall made to be functional safety devices, not aesthetic devices (at least not anymore).
-Dan
+1, I don't think it matters if it's shiny when it's installed. Cosmetics are pretty low on the list as Dan noted, and when it's sitting in a yard in pieces in 20 years it won't matter who made it or if it was shiny when installed.
I never said it guarentees quality 110%, but I firmly believe that quality does show when a product has a "fresh, clean" look to it. I have sources that tell me both McCain and Econolite both have moved their production of signal heads to Mexico (cheaper labor), however Eagle is still producing all its equipment at their Austin, TX facility. We've used Eagle equipment for years here, and even the fairly old-for-poly (late 1990s, early 2000's) stuff still has a nice finish to it...but theres four intersections here, two have McCain polys, and two have Econolite polys, and a few more do not have signals yet, but all those have a matte (almost as if they were used, when they were not) finish. And really if you think about it, why would we have switched from Eagle? Cheaper signals? Cheaper usually means not as high of quality in most cases...not all, but most.
I too work in plastic manufacturing and work with urethanes, polycarbonates, nylons, and other plastics and we make sure the parts have a nice gloss to them when they're done for the customer.